Attention: This site will be removed from January 5th at the request of School 42. To continue accessing it, contact me at 42-evals@gmx.ch
Please comply with the following rules:
- Remain polite, courteous, respectful, and constructive
throughout the
evaluation process. The well-being of the community depends on it.
- Identify
with the student or group whose work is evaluated the possible
dysfunctions in their project. Take the
time to discuss and debate the
problems that may have been identified.
- You must consider that
there might be some differences in how your peers
might have understood the project's instructions and
the scope of its
functionalities. Always keep an open mind and grade them as honestly as
possible.
The pedagogy is useful only and only if the peer-evaluation is
done seriously.
- Only grade the work that was turned in the Git repository of the evaluated
student or group.
-
Double-check that the Git repository belongs to the student(s). Ensure that
the project is the one
expected. Also, check that "git clone" is used in an
empty folder.
- Check carefully that no
malicious aliases were used to fool you and make you
evaluate something that is not the content of the
official repository.
- To avoid any surprises and if applicable, review together any scripts used
to facilitate the grading (scripts for testing or automation).
- If you have not completed the
assignment you are going to evaluate, you have
to read the entire subject before starting the
evaluation process.
- Use the available flags to report an empty repository, a non-functioning
program, a Norm error, cheating, and so forth.
In these cases, the evaluation process ends and the
final grade is 0,
or -42 in case of cheating. However, except for cheating, student are
strongly
encouraged to review together the work that was turned in,
to identify any mistakes that shouldn't be
repeated in the future.